Create your blog and photo album with postbit
Create your blog and photo album

Create new post


Upload a picture:
Tags (keywords separated by comma)

Save Cancel
sacrament56f:   Followers: 0 ; Following: 0

The Baptism Together with the Holy Spirit - A Regeneration and Sanctification Perspective

The Baptism Together with the Holy Spirit - A Regeneration and Sanctification Perspective

The Baptism with all the Holy Spirit is an extremely controversial subject within the Christian community. Although Christians of most denominations trust a soteriology with a baptism together with the Holy Spirit, theologically, all don't agree regarding serious amounts of manner in which a believer is baptized with all the Holy Spirit. Assurance of salvation

It's our belief that the Holy Spirit baptism is promised to every believer regenerated by faith in Christ. However, its not all believer is baptized with all the Holy Spirit at the time of conversion.

Once we check out the New Testament record located in the book of Acts, we shall discover, yes, it is simple to be transformed into Christ and regenerated with the Spirit, and yet not obtain the experience referred to as Baptism together with the Holy Spirit until a little while afterward.

How is it that We Read the Book of Acts?

The novel of Acts will be the only history book within the New Testament. Unlike the epistles, that happen to be letters written to churches or individuals to instruct believers in the faith; in Acts, Luke records with great detail the historical setting and chronology of the first century church as it unfolds, when prior to the morning of Pentecost 33 AD as well as the years right after.

While the epistles are written to the people who had already received the expertise of the baptism with all the Holy Spirit, the book of Acts alone offers the historical record of methods a number of the churches as well as people with whom the epistles were written were saved and subsequently received the ability referred to as the baptism with all the Holy Spirit.

Without staring at the book of Acts, one cannot understand or understand the distinction being born again with the Spirit and being baptized together with the Spirit. The theological contribution of each one historical account of early believers with the Holy Spirit is recorded by using these detail about give you a consistent biblical theology with respect to New Testament accounts of the Baptism with all the Holy Spirit.

Although many preachers be put off by the Holy Spirit phenomenon witnessed in Acts, or attempt to explain away the implications from the truths presented there, to disregard or simply just ignore this authentic historical record is to be negligent of rightly dividing the phrase of truth.

I believe that this failure of several bible teachers to truthfully and accurately portray the biblical record within the book of Acts may be the sole reasons why a sizable segment with the body of Christ falls short of the effectiveness of God and in comprehending the workings of His Spirit.

Through the all this writing we shall try to address these:

1) What is the baptism together with the Holy Spirit?
2) Could be the baptism with all the Holy Spirit following salvation or concurrent with salvation?
3) Will there be is often a difference between being baptized from the Spirit and being baptized with all the Spirit?
4) Is there a distinction between obtaining the gift with the Holy Spirit talking to other tongues and getting the gift of tongues?
5) Can there be is really a contrast between the goal of speaking in other tongues as a sign and the reason for the spiritual gift of divers (diverse) types of tongues?

There are a few who support the view, to become born of the Spirit and be baptized together with the Spirit are essentially one along with the selfsame experience. Others contain the view, to become born again with the Spirit is indeed distinctive from the baptism with all the Spirit, but both always occur simultaneously. However, will the Acts' record support these positions?

Our study reveals, the Acts record signifies that some believers did experience the Baptism together with the Holy Spirit after conversion and then for any public confession of religion in Christ, while others received the baptism together with the Spirit ahead of any public confession of religion in Christ.

As we examine the Acts record, we shall soon discover that:

The Baptism with the Holy Spirit is definitely different from the Birth from the Spirit. If we examine both experiences closely look for these to be true:

1) The birth of the Spirit is definitely an act of regeneration as well as the re-birth from the believer into Christ in salvation.
2) The baptism together with the Spirit can be an act of sanctification and also the setting apart in the believer for service.

How can this be distinction important?

In regeneration, every believer is baptized through the Spirit into (gk. eis) Christ.
In sanctification, every believer is baptized by Christ into (eis) the Holy Spirit.

Into One Body, Into One Spirit

The subsequent scriptural references will show that you have two distinct operations from the Godhead intended for being born-again with the Spirit and subsequently being baptized together with the Spirit.

"For by one Spirit shall we be all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond reely; and have been all built to drink into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13) KJV.

"And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven as being a dove, plus it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the identical said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt understand the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, precisely the same is he which baptizeth together with the Holy Ghost" (Jn. 1:32-33) KJV.

The term by in 1 Cor. 12:13 describes the regenerative agency of the person from the Holy Spirit, while the word within Jn. 1:33 describes the sanctifying agency of the individual of Christ. Although Greek word en is translated from the Bible as by, with, in, and thru, in the context of these scriptures there is no mistaking the reality that:

Two separate persons in the Godhead are involved in the operation (gk. energia) to be born from the Spirit as well as in the operation of being baptized with the Spirit.

Notice carefully, in a operation (regeneration) the Holy Spirit will be the baptizer into Jesus. Inside the other operation (sanctification), Jesus could be the baptizer with and in to the Holy Spirit.

1) In regeneration > the Holy Spirit > will be the baptizer > into Jesus Christ
2) In sanctification > Christ > will be the baptizer > to the Holy Spirit

One might naturally ask, how is the believer baptized both with and in the Holy Spirit simultaneously?

The phrase baptize means to immerse, dip, or plunge. Accordingly, when a believer is baptized with all the Holy Spirit he/she is baptized both with the Spirit and immersed in to the Spirit, equally as a believer is baptized both with water and immersed into water.

The commitment of the Father to present another comforter was fulfilled right then and there of Pentecost A.D. 33 whilst started to pour from His Spirit upon all flesh. The daddy works all things from the finished work of His Son, Jesus, from the Holy Spirit.

Jesus said that the Holy Spirit wasn't yet given as he had not been yet glorified. Because of this the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus (the finished work of Christ) had to occur prior to the Holy Spirit could possibly be directed at men. Prior to the day's Pentecost the disciples received what is known the breath of promise (Jn. 20:22).

The Baptism of Regeneration

The baptism with the Spirit into Christ can also be referred to as baptism of regeneration. It's the same experience spoken of by Paul in Titus 3:5 as the washing of regeneration.

We should take care here, because even though word washing is used on this verse; notice, the words water or water baptism is just not. Consequently, this verse is just not inferring baptismal regeneration by water as some incorrectly teach. This verse does, however, teach baptismal regeneration by the Spirit.

The word washing (gk: loutron) in Titus 3:5 has nothing regarding water baptism, except in a figurative sense. Because, baptism with water illustrates what the Spirit has recently accomplished in regeneration. Thus, Paul concludes how the washing of regeneration and the renewing with the believer is from the Holy Spirit.

In conclusion, the new-birth from the Spirit regenerates the believer and places the believer to the Body of Christ. The Baptism with all the Holy Spirit subsequently sanctifies the believer which is an endowment of power (gk. dunamis) equipping the believer for service so that you can match the great commission.

There's One Baptism together with the Holy Spirit

In Ephesians 4:5 Paul writes there's one Lord, one faith, and one baptism. Simply what does this mean?

It is uncertain whether this verse is the term for water baptism or Sprit baptism; the context will not say. Although Greek word used here is baptisma and it's also employed in the newest Testament with water baptism, the Greek word for baptize is applied to both water baptism and the baptism using the Holy Spirit.

Comes to the Spirit, there is only 1 baptism together with the Spirit. However, there are many re-fillings of the Spirit. So, when Paul writes, be not drunk with wine, but be filled with the Spirit, it is an fundamental to all believers to reside in continually within the power and influence of the Holy Spirit rather than under the influence of drugs and alcohol.

Although a believer may be baptized with all the Holy Spirit only one time, the believer may continually drink into one Spirit and be filled and re-filled often during the entire believer's lifetime.

Have you received the Holy Ghost because you believed?

Is every believer presumed to become baptized together with the Holy Spirit immediately upon believing in Christ? Some teach this, however:

In Acts chapter 19 there's an occasion where Paul found certain former disciples of John the Baptist and asked them an extraordinary question: Perhaps you have received the Holy Ghost since ye believed?

Now, if every believer is automatically presumed being baptized with all the Holy Spirit upon faith, conversion, and regeneration, then Paul's question to the telltale disciples makes no sense in any way.

The only method Paul's question makes sense is actually there were an expectation of your pending subsequent experience of the Holy Spirit after faith, conversion, and regeneration from the Spirit.

This facts are also born outside another interesting account within Acts chapter 8 in which the Samaritans came to faith in Christ, were even baptized in water, but would not get the Baptism together with the Holy Spirit until the apostles, Peter and John came and laid their hands upon them.

Both of these accounts and more in Acts, prove that there is a baptism together with the Holy Spirit this is a separate and distinct experience from your birth from the Spirit.

These Signs Shall Follow Them That Believe

There's an important and necessary correlation between faith and then any operation in the Spirit; be it linked to salvation, healing, miracles, etc. This is especially valid with the baptism using the Holy Spirit.

Many believers can trust Christ for salvation, but cannot rely on him for other items like divine healing or perhaps this example the baptism with the Spirit.

A lot of with this. Insufficient proper teaching and understanding in this field brings about insufficient faith. A lack of faith and unbelief may prevent a saved person from receiving the Holy Spirit baptism.

We're told a few times in scripture that faith in Christ can be a prerequisite for receiving the baptism with the Holy Spirit. Jesus said, He that believeth on me, since the scripture hath said, from his belly shall flow rivers of life water.

There are 2 Greek words employed in scripture to denote the excellence between obtaining the gift with the Holy Spirit (evidenced by speaking with other tongues) along with the spiritual gift of tongues. They're: dorea and charisma.

It becomes an important distinction because, one much first get the gift (dorea) from the Holy Spirit before one may get an individual gift (charisma) or gifts in the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit baptism with all the sign or proof of conversing with other tongues ought not to become confused with the present of tongues used in prayer, praise, and prophecy.

Just a little known simple truth is, the saying dorea (gift) is always found in scripture to distinguish the present of the Holy Spirit evidenced by speaking with other tongues, as the word charisma (gift) is obviously used from the gift of tongues.

Whenever speaking with other tongues is referred to in Acts regarding the the baptism with the Holy Spirit the phrase dorea is definitely used. However, whenever speaking in tongues is employed elsewhere inside the New Testament, the saying charisma is utilized to indicate the spiritual gift.

So, when Paul asks the issue, do all speak with tongues; he or she is speaking about the spiritual gift (charisma) rather than for the gift (dorea) in the Holy Spirit together with the symbol of speaking with other tongues.

It is often my experience to watch a believer may the truth is consult with other tongues during the time of their baptism together with the Holy Spirit, but can not ever subsequently receive or operate in the gift of tongues whatsoever.

The charisma gift of tongues is referred to in scripture as divers kinds (gk. genos) of tongues and diversities (genos) of tongues. For the reason that you can find essentially two distinct classifications or kinds (genos) in the gift of tongues. You can find devotional and prophetic tongues and each has a different function and purpose.

Devotional tongues really are a prayer and praise language - its function is, man speaking with God, and it is purpose is always to edify the individual believer. Prophetic tongues can be a language of prophecy - its function is, God speaking to man. When in conjunction with the gift of interpretation of tongues its purpose is usually to edify the complete church.

It's prophesying in tongues (when God talks to man) that requires interpretation. However, prayer offered in tongues (when man speaks to God) doesn't need an interpretation, since the speaker is definitely praying to God and not talking with man, God does not have an interpreter.

The gap being, praying in tongues edifies normally the one doing the praying, while prophesying in tongues edifies the entire church. For that reason prophecy in tongues have to be interpreted.

Throughout the baptism with the Spirit, a believer may speak with whether devotional or prophetic language that's unknown to the speaker. This really is indicative to any or all present but especially those who believe not.

It is usually taught that those who believe not reference unsaved people. However, that is only partially correct. People who believe not, can also reference any individual (saved you aren't) that's unlearned and will not have confidence in the potency of God to cast out devils, consult with new tongues, heal the sick, etc,.

When Jesus said, these signs shall follow them that believe, he seemed to be declaring that supernatural manifestations from the energy God (signs) would follow those who have faith. However, when they will not have faith these signs will not likely follow them.

Probably, no account in Acts is more revealing than chapter 8 with regard to the baptism using the Holy Spirit being an experience separate and dissimilar to regeneration.

In Acts 8 Phillip the Evangelist preaches the gospel to Samaria where lots of believe and they are baptized. However, it's expressly explained otherwise before apostles Peter and John located town and laid their face to face them that they received the baptism with the Holy Spirit.

The question remains, if there wasn't any evidence of this experience, then how did Simon the sorcerer yet others know the Holy Spirit had fallen about the believers in Samaria? Because, he just like the others beheld the signs that were done.

And let's keep in mind the family unit of Cornelius the 1st Gentile converts to Christ, who received the baptism with all the Holy Spirit speaking with tongues while Peter yet preached Christ unto them.

The sole sign that accompanied the baptism with the Holy Ghost within the bible was that relating to speaking with other tongues because the Spirit gave utterance.

Some bible teachers have tried to explain away the phenomenon of saved believers who didn't receive the baptism with all the Holy Spirit until sometime later. They teach to ensure the Jews, Samaritans, and Gentile nations (like a people group) to obtain your initial in-filling with the Holy Spirit an apostle would have to be show certify them.

Furthermore, some teach, once each people group received the Holy Spirit baptism with the laying on of hands associated with an apostle, there was no longer an expectation of getting the baptism together with the Holy Spirit together with the indication of speaking in tongues. Interestingly, the bible does not support this theory, also it depends upon simply speculation.

Finally, our last instance of a saved parent receiving the baptism together with the Holy Ghost subsequent to salvation and conversion could be the apostle Paul himself. Whom, having had hands laid on him by Ananias (who had previously been not an apostle) received his sight and it was simultaneously baptized and stuffed with the Holy Spirit.

At any time the ebook of Acts has an account where believers initially receive the Holy Spirit, it can be considered as the baptism or even the in-filling with the Holy Spirit. However, remember, there is certainly only 1 baptism using the Holy Spirit but many re-fillings.

Is there a contrast between a Pentecostal along with a Charismatic?

There exists a contrast between a Pentecostal and a Charismatic. Pentecostals hold towards the teaching the baptism together with the Holy Ghost is usually with the evidence (or sign) of conversing with other tongues.

Charismatics, however, are believers who've received the baptism with all the Holy Spirit evidenced by addressing other tongues, when they were people in other denominations or groups aside from classical Pentecostal groups.

In addition, unlike Pentecostals, Charismatics speak with tongues and operate in other spiritual gifts, but don't necessarily hold the baptism with all the Spirit is always evidenced by addressing other tongues. Some Charismatics hold that the baptism together with the Spirit could possibly be evidenced by other gifts of the Spirit for example healing, prophecy, etc.

In summary, it's impossible to formulate a regular and biblical theology from the experience known as the baptism with all the Holy Spirit without examining the accounts referenced in the book of Acts.

We affirm there's a distinct Christian experience of the Bible termed as the baptism with the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit baptism is an endowment of capacity to equip the believer to witness for Christ and to perform the great commission.

The Holy Spirit Baptism is subsequent to salvation and could occur as well as salvation. However, being baptized with all the Spirit in sanctification can be a distinct work from the Godhead aside from being baptized with the Spirit in regeneration.

There is also a among obtaining the gift (dorea) from the Holy Ghost and receiving the gift (charisma) of tongues. And although speaking in tongues can serve a dual function and purpose (devotional or prophetic) simultaneously, there exists a among the part and purpose of speaking in other tongues being a sign and also the spiritual gift of diverse kinds (genos) of tongues. Assurance of salvation

Post by sacrament56f (2016-08-02 13:47)

Post your comment:

Name: Email: Site:

| Explore users | New posts | Create your blog | Create your photo album |
| About Postbit | Our blog | Terms of use | Contact Postbit |

Copyright © 2019 -